What Can We Know About Heaven and Hell?
I’ve heard a lot of sermons on heaven and hell. Too many I think. But I have noticed something interesting in the last few years: the detailed accuracy with which people describe both eternal places. Preachers seem to know everything about heaven and hell. Particularly hell. And that strikes me as strange for a couple of reasons.
First, the New Testament language about heaven is pretty vague. Certainly not up to our Western standards of rational detailed analysis. Most heavenly images are taken from Revelation which is clearly a book of symbols and Jewish apocalyptic imagery. Plus we have various experts describing heaven in detail for us, even down to what kind of house we get and what types of jobs will be waiting for us. Honestly, despite the popularity of Randy Alcorn’s book, most of that is conjecture. Peacefulness, joy, and comfort certainly describe it, but most people understand that golden streets and crystal seas are illustrations for something truly indescribable. People are okay with a preacher saying, “I don’t know everything about heaven, but I know it’s gonna be good!”
What’s more fascinating is the painstaking detail in which hell is described. Eternal torment involving fire, pain, and torture. According to most evangelial views of hell, people have the rest of eternity to sit around on fire and think about the bad things they did. Okay, that’s a little sarcastic there, but honestly hell is used more often in altar calls than heaven is. Some people, just in my questioning of the standard image of hell are getting nervous reading this right now. But what’s so strange about that is just how ambiguous the Bible is about the afterlife. People are satisfied to know that God has prepared somewhere for them in heaven and that puts their lack of detail at ease. But hell is a different story. In fact, the more detailed you can be, the better chance of scaring someone into salvation.
But really, hell is even more ambiguous than heaven. The Old Testament uses the word sheol to describe the afterlife – a word that means “grave” and little more. The Jews were relatively unconcerned about the afterlife, fully content to focus on what they could do in the present life to honor God. The New Testament seems to be more exact. But a closer look shows that there’s still much to debate. Jesus describes some ideas about it, but never really gives us details. He compares it to a local garbage dump (Gehenna) and talks about worms. And there’s more. The Greek word (aiōnios) generally used to describe the fire of hell is translated in as “eternal” – a period of time. But in other places, the same word is used to describe an act of permanence of destruction – a state of quality. So, traditionalists say that it means eternal fire while conditionalists say it means permanent destruction (death) of the wicked. But the truth is that aiōnios and its Hebrew counterpart (olam) speak of things that all come to an end: the Passover, Caleb’s inheritance, Solomon’s Temple, and Gehazi’s leprosy. It’s just not that simple – the word means both. Similarly, traditionalists say that “gnashing of teeth” describes the torment of sinners in hell. But the ancient use found in the Old Testament assigned “gnashing of teeth” to someone about to destroy another – in the conditionalist’s case: God. So what does that mean to us today? Honestly, it doesn’t tell us much. And that’s the point I’m making. The same verses are used by people who believe different things about hell. And, surprisingly, I’m okay with that.
Why can we leave the details of heaven alone yet be compelled to extract every detail about hell? Because hell helps preachers out. Descriptions of hell illicit responses from people and, if used just right, can increase altar call numbers. But in doing that, I think we miss the point. When I told someone the other night that the gospel is not about them not going to hell, they looked at me strangely. They simply had never thought that there might be something beyond “fire insurance” and a list of do’s and don’ts to the gospel. The Bible shrouds the afterlife in ambiguity for a very important reason: so we won’t be tempted to bribe people into the Kingdom of God using either heaven or hell. If that’s what made you decide to be a Christian, then great. But intimacy with God lies beyond such ”survival of the fittest” techniques of evangelism. The gospel is about falling in love with a God who has already declared his unconquerable love for you.
6 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (6)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (13)
- April 2009 (15)
- March 2009 (18)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (11)
- December 2008 (12)
-
Categories
- American Idol
- atheism
- athletics
- Bible
- books
- business
- calvinism
- children
- Christianity
- church
- church history
- consumerism
- culture
- dad
- diet
- divorce
- entertainment
- eschatology
- exercise
- Extreme Makeover
- family
- father
- football
- forgiveness
- gay
- George W. Bush
- God
- Holy Spirit
- homosexual
- humor
- husbands
- internet
- Jesus Christ
- Joel Osteen
- leadership
- lesbian
- life
- literature
- love
- marriage
- medicine
- Methodism
- Methodist Church
- missions
- mom
- mother
- music
- New Age
- occultism
- open theism
- parenting
- philosophy
- politics
- praise and worship
- preaching
- Process Theology
- psychology
- Reformed theology
- religion
- science
- sociology
- spirituality
- sports
- technology
- The Shack
- theology
- Uncategorized
- wicca
- wives
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
Thank you for this! I must say that this is one of my bigger concerns with how forms of Christianity close to me, have been disseminated and defended. Fear of hell seems to me to be rather feeble, if not defective, grounds for belief.
The people of the HB and second testament were, more or less, just not concerned with afterlife. Their focus was on sustaining and cultivating further grounds for their relationship with the divine.
Comment by Chris Hoover | November 14, 2009 |
“Their focus was on sustaining and cultivating further grounds for their relationship with the divine.”
I completely agree – sometimes I feel as though Christianity’s preoccupation with future events and places is simply because the Kingdom of God in the here and now is not what they initially hoped it would be. To me, the most important eschatology for our generation is a realized, present state one. Anyone is likely to spend their days dreaming about the sweet by and by and if Chrisitanity in no way radically alters the day to day grind of the present.
Comment by Sam | November 14, 2009 |
While it very well may be that “descriptions of hell illicit responses from people and, if used just right, can increase altar call numbers”, they will not keep people on the road of faith and hope and love. Fear is a primal emotion. Avoidance of pain or threat is very basic. They may bring an immediate response. But, these are very low and weak motivations over the long haul. Once the threat is believed to be avoided, a person can then relax. This is no introduction to a life of faith and discipleship!
Comment by Craig L. Adams | November 14, 2009 |
Right on, Craig – fear is conformative but love is transformative. Conversion through fear? Maybe so. But certainly not sanctification. And sanctification through fear or the avoidance of pain is temporary at best. Once conversion averts hell, then like you said, people start to “relax” and have trouble taking their own faith seriously. Relationality breeds a deep faith and a constant discipleship – true sanctification – which is probably what God is after anyway…
Comment by Sam | November 14, 2009 |
Sam… this is great. And quite frankly, those of us who feel this way are oft afraid to even talk of such… especially in the circles we attend. I’ll have to say that it was an itenerate evangelist who “frightened me into heaven…” so to speak. I do believe that at that moment I did accept Christ as my savior… but, it was out of fear and not in a desire for a relationship. I just get so frustrated with all the scare tactics of which I see people subjected.
It was not until a close mutual friend shared with me the love of Christ… both in word and deed. I can’t go into detail here… but, now I know deliverance… I know the love of my Savior, Brother, and Friend.
Comment by Joe | November 14, 2009 |
Hi Joe –
Thanks for sharing that – your story is so similar to most. What’s worse, people are usually frightened into heaven when a well meaning preacher creates a dilemma using scary God and merciful Jesus. There’s only one problem: God is Jesus! And the example we see in the life in ministry of Jesus is what God has wanted us to know about him all along.
There’s nothing lie having a friend strip away that false view of God – we don’t have to perform in order to pacify him. We just have to crawl up in his lap and let him love us.
Comment by Sam | November 16, 2009 |